Elinor Ostrom
also a professor and a lead researcher for the Sustainable Agriculture and Natural
Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANFREM CRISP).
Ostrom was born during the Great Depression on August 7, 1933 in Los Angeles,
California. She was raised as a “poor kid” to divorced artisans in conjunction with the
wealthy kids in Beverly Hills, her surrounding neighborhood. A hobby she adopted as a
child was swimming. This hobby grew into a passion, and Ostrom began to swim
competitively on teams and later became a swim teacher. Money from teaching funded
her schooling at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) where she received
her B.A. in political science in 1954.
A woman pursuing work within economics was controversial during the 1950s. Ostrom
faced gender discrimination at UCLA, and only took her first economics course in the
final year of her undergraduate career. She was rejected from UCLA’s Ph.D. program in
economics due to lack of math courses, but was admitted to the political science
program where she earned her M.A. and Ph.D. in 1962 and 1965 respectively. As a
graduate student, Ostrom met both her husband Vincent Ostrom and her interest in
economic governance of common pool resources, or “the commons”.
Complementing her formal political science education, Ostrom’s research incorporated
economic principles such rational choice theory to support both public choice and
ecological conservation. The work that Ostrom produced was not well-supported within
the social sciences at the time as it starkly contrasted economist William Forster
Lloyd’s assertion of “the tragedy of the commons”. In his essay published in 1833,
Lloyd argued that collectively used natural resources would be destroyed by individuals
acting in self-interest. His argument implied the necessity of central authorities and/or
private ownership in managing natural resources. This notion was still widely accepted
nearly 130 years later. Ostrom, however, used case studies to demonstrate that
ordinary citizens could sustainably govern common pool resources with neither the use
of privatization or the intervention of central authorities.
Ostrom’s work also contradicted the work of a popular ecologists including Garrett
Hardin. Hardin, a Eugenicist and welfare-state opponent, widely advocated for abortion
rights and population control. He incorporated the “tragedy of the commons” in his
ecological work and maintained the Malthusian theory, arguing that overpopulation and
overconsumption were threatening the planet. Nevertheless, Elinor Ostrom found that
rational actors could manage finite resources in ways that supported ecological
conversation.
Ostrom’s discovery was made using dozens of fieldwork cases in which she examined
the use and management of communal resources such as irrigation systems in Nepal
and Spain, fisheries in Indonesia and Maine, and villages in Switzerland and Japan.
Ostrom found that these communities of ordinary individuals were absolutely capable of
organizing and managing “the commons”. The case studies founded Ostrom’s Law: 8
governing features of successful management of “the commons”. Her studies of these
successful co-operative systems made her the first and only woman to ever receive the
Nobel Prize in economics and ignited a resurgence in the discussion of political economy.
Her assessment of property rights is yet significant in civil law.
Her assessment of property rights is yet significant in civil law.
She shared the Nobel with Oliver Williamson. Both of them were concerned a great deal with governance as a way to manage transaction costs and get good behavior by participants. For example, student behavior on our campus is governed by the Student Code. I'm guessing that most students are only vaguely aware of it. But when a serious transgression occurs, it guides how the situation will be handled thereafter.
ReplyDelete