Satisficing
Whereas many people were taught that it’s a “dog eat dog world”, I learned to “take one
for the team”. Throughout my life, I’ve always had to be a team player. I grew up one of four
children. For a bunch of kids who shared a room for 7 years, we hardly bickered. One thing
was for certain: we had each other’s back. I had always been part of a team. I ran track,
played soccer, was in drama club, and debated on the high school debate team. There were
many times that I put what I believed was best for the team before my selfish concerns.
Unfortunately, selflessness sometimes blurs rationality and can make decisions much harder
for me. I was taught to consider the actors involved in my own decisions and how my choices
affect other people. On the contrary, opportunism does not consider other actors. When a
person acts opportunistically, they willfully exploit others for gain.
I could have acted opportunistically by seizing a position held by a coworker on
temporary leave. In May of 2016, I was hired as a beauty advisor (BA) at Walgreens. My job
was to help customers, maintain the beauty department, stock inventory, reset item
placement, and the like. My place as BA was nearly exclusively working in the beauty
department. That position soon dissolved. Shortly afterwards, the beauty consultant (BC)
position was introduced. While fairly similar, the BC position entailed far less less manual
labor. The main tasks of the BC were to assist customers with all beauty needs and keep the
department clean and organized. I was not offered the opportunity to switch over. One of my
managers believed that I lacked the tenacity to take on such change. I did not know until
nearly a year later that this position paid $2 more an hour. I became a CSA. I was now
responsible for duties similar to the BA position, but for the entire store. In order to meet the
unique demands of my store, a total of 60 hours were offered for the BC position: one 40
hour full time position and a 20 hour part time position. These spots were taken by Rachel, a
graduate who had worked in beauty before, and Fahren, a college freshman. When the
school year ended, Fahren, as the part time employee, left for the summer. To enjoy her
summer, Rachel dropped to 35 hours a week. Beauty sales began to decline as a result, and
my store manager gently pushed for me to become the part-time BC. I was offered 25 hours
a week.
I thought about the benefits of accepting the offer and what this change would mean for
me and my son. The hours were not only ideal with the latest shift being midshift (12PM-
8:30PM), but also consistent from week to week. Throughout the school year, I closed on
Wednesdays with a child. The hours were so late that we would stay overnight with our sitter
so that we wouldn’t have to travel home so late. And although the BC position was less
hours, my take-home pay would increase after subtracting costly babysitting since I would no
longer be a closer. Lastly, positions are plentiful for CSAs - there are only two BC positions.
Thus, raises can be easily determined since BCs are more directly evaluated for their
individual work. Lastly, less hours would mean that I had more time to spend with my son or
doing homework.
After a week of contemplation, I decided to decline the offer despite pressure from
managers. I knew that Fahren wanted to come back to school and resume her position. A
“rec” was opened for this position instead. If someone else was going to get it, I figured so be
it. It would not sit on my conscience and risk permanent distrust with my coworkers. Still, I
needed more money. I loved my customers. I loved my team. I loved my store’s central
location. However, rather than staying with the company, I began filling out applications
elsewhere. I landed a position that paid $2 more an hour. By looking for another job rather
than taking the optimal position as the BC, I was satisficing. The processing for this position
lasted 3 weeks while I did several certification classes. In the third week, the BC Rachel
permanently left her full time position. My store manager offered me a solution that would
prevent the transition I was regretting to: now there were 50 hours total to be split 30:20
between me and Fahren. I accepted the full time position and was officially promoted.
One quick comment about the formatting before getting to the content of your post. Your first paragraph starts out with the same dark text that is in the other paragraphs, but then it switches to gray text. Was that an accident or done deliberately?
ReplyDeleteI want to make an observation that make sense to me but may not make sense to you. I believe being a good team player is somewhat different from being able to get along with other people. Not all interactions with others are team interactions. And if the team is really working as a unit, each participant needs to understand not just their own role but also the roles of every other team member. Taking one for the team in the latter sense means helping some or all of the other team members perform their roles better. Getting along with others, in contrast, may be more about being able to get them to relax and be comfortable in interactions, and in showing empathy when that is needed. I do think there is some overlap between the two but they are not totally coincident.
So, regarding how you felt about Fahren, I seems to me that was more of an empathy thing than a team thing. I know you could consider everyone who worked at the store as part of a team, but for that to be convincing you'd need to talk about other activities where co-workers did to teamwork. It may be that was happening, but I didn't see it described in your essay.
Then I wanted to comment on one particular point you made, which was about the drop in Beauty sales in the summer. You attributed this to a reduction in hours supplied by the BC position. But the town definitely has fewer students during the summer. Could that also explain things? As a reader, I like to be skeptical and entertain alternate possible explanations. You may be right, but to convince me that the reduction in hours was the real explanation you have to make some argument why the other is not.
A couple other points. Did you ever swap shifts with any of the other BCs in the store? Doing that might be closer in the teamwork category. Also, the Walgreens where I go to seems to have some personnel who have worked there for years, in the pharmacy and also at the cash register. But your store, if it does rely on student employees more, is likely to have turnover that can be anticipated. So you might comment on what the store does to groom replacements, in general, and then relate that to your own experience.