Illinibucks
Time tickets for registration are given to students on the basis of major, class year, and
whether the student is an honors student. Seniors and honors students generally get earlier
registration dates. After some time, the classes “open up” to the general student body with
some exceptions (e.i. major restrictions that apply to required courses within a program).
Afterwards, course registration operates on a first come first serve basis. Students who miss
their initial time ticket may begin to check course registrar obsessively awaiting an open seat
in a desired class.
In the interest of student retention and timely graduations, registration with Illinibucks
should closely follow the current priority system. A program like Illinibucks could alleviate
some of the stress that follows the initial window of class registrations by moving students to
the start of the line formed once the priority basis is met. This would encourage students to
act swiftly when registering for classes within their program. Illinibucks for registration
should be a system that automatically enrolls paying students in open seats for the classes of
their choice. Each student would be endowed an amount of Illinibucks “I”. The university
could charge a pre-specified amount of P Illinibucks to reserve a seat for “non-priority”
students with the price depending on the popularity of the class. This system should carry on
until classes meet their capacity, or the end of an official “round”. Because subsequent
placement is dependent on unpredictable drops, the next round should be less pricey where
students pay for holds in the case that a seat opens. Between “holds” for seats and
automatic registration, students should be able to withdraw their Illinibucks so as not to lock
in a price and withstand insufferable waiting times. In this period, if the supply is severely
less than the demand, the university can plan future arrangements to prevent such
constraints. Because each student is allocated the same amount of Illinibucks, the system is
fair: students willing to pay more for any given class get priority.
Some cons of such a system may be the lack of transparency. It would be nearly
impossible for students to know whether or not they are getting cheated. Another potential
flaw is the system mimicking the status quo. Angsty students might move their “hold” bucks
as they grow impatient. Perhaps for this reason, there should be some penalty for
withdrawing a “hold”. However, a possible benefit of Illinibucks could be that it boosts
morale and student GPAs and limit pesky drops in the beginning of the semester. People
willing to pay higher prices for classes they want to take may also value their classes more.
They are also no longer “getting stuck” with classes that they don’t care about due to
registering late. The Illinibucks should definitely complement rather than replace the current
system to guarantee graduation and retention. Since the current system is fit to see that
students within a program take all of their required courses and can access program
electives, I believe being totally reliant on student preferences would decrease retention and
graduation. Another harmful factor to anticipate is that students endowed with a set amount
of Illinibucks at the beginning of the semester may compulsively use them for class
registration similar to the rich teen analogy.
The Illinibucks might also be able to purchase more speedy and flexible advising
appointments. A proper way to utilize these Illinibucks for advising could be to implement a
system similar to Skype calls where students can “buy” time at intervals without having to
wait in a physical space for an advisor. If a student’s urgent concern is lengthy, they must
spend more Illinibucks and vice versa. Non-emergencies could follow the current scheduling
system.
If I could use Illinibucks, I would use them to make my registration time earlier. I am a
senior in economics and sociology. However, occasionally there are classes outside my
programs that I want to take. Sometimes it is impossible to act fast enough when I have
limited information. Incessantly checking course registrar is time intensive. I would much
rather pay to await a seat than to go through the process of waiting, checking, and
registering.
Let me focus on just one point you made - the unpredictable drops. I think it is different for the case where a students is registered for more courses than they plan to take than it is for a student who has a setback early - getting quite sick, a major issue in the family, or underperforming on the first midterm when that wasn't expected in advance. In the latter category, I would think that ahead of time they should be considered completely random. The possibility must be allowed for, but the person can't have lower priority just because the unlikely event does happen.
ReplyDeleteHowever, for a person in the first category, that may be forecasted with some accuracy, especially if the person has done this sort of hoarding in the past and dropped a course then. Such students, it seems to me, should have lower priority, or be forced to prioritize the courses they register for ahead of time. These are the students who should be bumped if Illinibucks were used to give somebody else priority.